Skip to content

← ArchivePaper2012

Physical Face Cloning

Bernd Bickel, Peter Kaufmann, Markus Gross, Wojciech Matusik, Paul Beardsley, Thabo Beeler

SIGGRAPHDisney ResearchFacialMuscles

Fabrication-oriented method for cloning the physical mechanics of a human face into a robotic or animatronic face system.

Abstract

This paper presents a complete process for designing, simulating, and fabricating synthetic skin for an animatronics character that mimics a given subject's face and expressions. The process begins by measuring the elastic properties of a silicone material used to manufacture synthetic soft tissue, then captures 3D facial expressions of a target subject through performance capture. A physics-based optimization scheme, built on a neo-Hookean finite element model, jointly determines the thickness of the synthetic skin and the actuation parameters of the robotic base that best match the target expressions. The method is validated by physically cloning a real human face onto an animatronic figure via injection molding.

How to read this

Category
Method / fabrication pipeline: cloning a face into animatronic skin
Contributions
  • An end-to-end process to design, simulate, and fabricate synthetic silicone skin for an animatronic character matching a subject's face
  • Measurement of the silicone's elastic properties plus performance capture of the target subject's facial expressions
  • A neo-Hookean FEM physics-based optimization that jointly solves for skin thickness and robotic actuation parameters, validated by physically cloning a real face
Context
Combines facial performance capture with physically-based FEM simulation of soft tissue, applied to the fabrication/animatronics setting rather than pure on-screen rendering.
Correctness
Validated by actually fabricating an animatronic face via injection molding, which is strong evidence; the results are bounded by the neo-Hookean material model, the captured expression set, and the actuation hardware, so matching is approximate and constrained by what the physical base can actuate.
Clarity
Accessible as a pipeline narrative; a first pass conveys the design-simulate-fabricate loop, a second pass is needed for the FEM optimization formulation.
How to read it
First pass for the full pipeline and the joint thickness/actuation optimization idea; second pass on the neo-Hookean FEM and the optimization setup if you care about the physics or fabrication side.

Related work

Keywords

This page summarises the entry and links to its original source. The archive never hosts or redistributes the publication itself.Show it in the full archive list →