Skip to content

← ArchivePaper2013

Online Modeling for Realtime Facial Animation

Sofien Bouaziz, Yangang Wang, Mark Pauly

SIGGRAPHAcademic297 citesFacial

Online 3D morphable model fitting for real-time facial animation from depth sensor input with continuous model adaptation.

Abstract

We present a new algorithm for realtime face tracking on commodity RGB-D sensing devices. Our method requires no user-specific training or calibration, or any other form of manual assistance, thus enabling a range of new applications in performance-based facial animation and virtual interaction at the consumer level. The key novelty of our approach is an optimization algorithm that jointly solves for a detailed 3D expression model of the user and the corresponding dynamic tracking parameters. Realtime performance and robust computations are facilitated by a novel subspace parameterization of the dynamic facial expression space. We provide a detailed evaluation that shows that our approach significantly simplifies the performance capture workflow, while achieving accurate facial tracking for realtime applications.

How to read this

Category
Method: real-time facial tracking via online model fitting
Contributions
  • A calibration-free, training-free real-time face tracking algorithm for commodity RGB-D sensors
  • Joint optimization that simultaneously solves for a detailed 3D expression model of the user and the dynamic tracking parameters
  • A subspace parameterization of the dynamic facial expression space for robust, real-time computation
Context
Continues performance-based facial animation from depth input, building on Weise et al.'s Realtime Performance-Based Facial Animation by removing the user-specific training/calibration step.Builds on: Realtime Performance-Based Facial Animation
Correctness
Relies on commodity RGB-D input and on the assumption that a per-user expression model can be recovered online jointly with tracking; the authors provide an evaluation showing accurate tracking, but reader should remember robustness depends on depth-sensor quality and the chosen subspace's expressiveness.
Clarity
Clearly motivated; a first pass conveys the online-modeling idea, a second pass is needed for the joint optimization and subspace formulation.
How to read it
Focus on what the joint solve estimates (model vs. tracking parameters) and the subspace parameterization; do a second pass on the optimization to see how calibration is avoided.

Builds on

Built upon by

Nothing yet.

Related work

Keywords

This page summarises the entry and links to its original source. The archive never hosts or redistributes the publication itself.Show it in the full archive list →