Skip to content

← ArchivePaper2019

Latent-space Dynamics for Reduced Deformable Simulation

Lawson Fulton, Vismay Modi, David Duvenaud, David I.W. Levin, Alec Jacobson

CGFAcademic122 cites1 descendantML Deformation

Autoencoder neural network defines a nonlinear reduced space for deformable solid dynamics, solving implicit integration in latent space.

Abstract

We propose the first reduced model simulation framework for deformable solid dynamics using autoencoder neural networks. We provide a data‐driven approach to generating nonlinear reduced spaces for deformation dynamics. In contrast to previous methods using machine learning which accelerate simulation by approximating the time‐stepping function, we solve the true equations of motion in the latent‐space using a variational formulation of implicit integration. Our approach produces drastically smaller reduced spaces than conventional linear model reduction, improving performance and robustness. Furthermore, our method works well with existing force‐approximation cubature methods.

How to read this

Category
Method: neural reduced-order model for deformable simulation
Contributions
  • Proposes an autoencoder-defined nonlinear reduced space for deformable solid dynamics
  • Solves the true equations of motion in latent space via a variational formulation of implicit integration, rather than approximating the time-stepping function
  • Yields much smaller reduced spaces than linear model reduction and stays compatible with existing force-approximation cubature
Context
Sits between data-driven dimensionality reduction and physics-based simulation, relating to the implicit-integration-as-optimization view popularized by Bouaziz et al.'s 'Projective Dynamics' (2014).Builds on: Projective Dynamics: Fusing Constraint Projections for Fast Simulation
Correctness
The central claim is that learning a nonlinear latent space and integrating physics within it beats linear reduction on size and robustness; this depends on training data covering the deformation regime, and like all reduced models it can struggle with motions outside that training distribution.
Clarity
Conceptually clear if you know model reduction; a first pass conveys the idea, while the variational implicit-integration formulation rewards a careful second pass.
How to read it
First pass for the autoencoder-replaces-linear-basis idea; do a focused second pass on the latent-space variational integrator and the cubature coupling if you intend to implement or extend it.

Builds on

Built upon by

Related work

Keywords

This page summarises the entry and links to its original source. The archive never hosts or redistributes the publication itself.Show it in the full archive list →