Skip to content

← ArchivePaper2019

Sharp Kelvinlets: Elastic Deformations with Cusps and Localized Falloffs

Fernando de Goes, Doug L. James

DigiProPixar7 citesRiggingSkinning

Extends Kelvinlet sculpting with a multi-scale convolution scheme enabling cusp-like elastic edits with sharp, localised falloff profiles.

Abstract

In this work, we present an extension of the regularized Kelvinlet technique suited to non-smooth, cusp-like edits. Our approach is based on a novel multi-scale convolution scheme that layers Kelvinlet deformations into a finite but spiky solution, thus offering physically based volume sculpting with sharp falloff profiles. We also show that the Laplacian operator provides a simple and effective way to achieve elastic displacements with fast far-field decay, thereby avoiding the need for multi-scale extrapolation. Finally, we combine the multi-scale convolution and Laplacian machinery to produce Sharp Kelvinlets, a new family of analytic fundamental solutions of linear elasticity with control over both the locality and the spikiness of the brush profile. Closed-form expressions and reference implementation are also provided.

How to read this

Category
Method: an analytic elastic-deformation brush for volume sculpting
Contributions
  • A multi-scale convolution scheme that layers Kelvinlet deformations into a spiky solution for cusp-like, non-smooth edits
  • Use of the Laplacian operator to obtain fast far-field decay without multi-scale extrapolation
  • Sharp Kelvinlets, a family of closed-form elasticity solutions with control over both locality and spikiness, plus a reference implementation
Context
A direct extension of Regularized Kelvinlets (de Goes and James 2017), which built sculpting brushes on fundamental solutions of linear elasticity; this work adds non-smooth, sharply-localized falloff profiles.Builds on: Regularized Kelvinlets: Sculpting Brushes Based on Fundamental Solutions of Elasticity
Correctness
Grounded in closed-form fundamental solutions of linear elasticity, so the deformations are physically based within that linear regime; the brushes are a controllable sculpting tool rather than a full physical simulation, so behavior under large or coupled deformations is outside the stated scope.
Clarity
Clear and self-contained with closed-form expressions and reference code; a first pass conveys the brush idea, a second pass is needed to follow the convolution and Laplacian derivations.
How to read it
Read 2017 Regularized Kelvinlets first; on the first pass focus on what cusp/spikiness control buys you, then do a formula-level second pass on the multi-scale convolution and Laplacian construction if you intend to implement it.

Builds on

Built upon by

Nothing yet.

Related work

Keywords

This page summarises the entry and links to its original source. The archive never hosts or redistributes the publication itself.Show it in the full archive list →